ProShop ERP vs Fulcrum
A side-by-side from public vendor information. Where one isn't clearly better, we say so.
| ProShop ERP | Fulcrum | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Quote-based (no pricing published) | Not published on homepage – demo/quote |
| Starting price | Not published – quote required | Not published – quote required |
| Deployment | Unknown – not stated on vendor homepage | Cloud |
| Shop types | job-shop, cnc, aerospace, medical | job-shop, fabrication, cnc, make-to-order |
| Size | 5–500 | 10–300 |
| Job costing | Yes – vendor says system tracks actual job costs and feeds quoting | Yes – real-time job costing from labor and machine time |
| MRP | Unverified on vendor homepage | BOM & routing confirmed; MRP depth unverified |
| Quality / traceability | Compliance-enforcing workflows, audit trail of sign-offs/changes; medical traceability claimed | Quality checks/logs on jobs mentioned; QMS depth unverified |
| AS9100 support | Yes – vendor markets AS9100 compliance for aerospace; also ITAR workflows and a CMMC Level 2 path (vendor claims) | Not claimed on homepage – verify |
| Scheduling | Unverified on vendor homepage | Yes – 'Autoschedule' automated scheduling |
| Integrations | Unverified – not listed on homepage | Unverified – not listed on homepage |
| Data checked | Checked 2026-10-23 | Checked 2026-10-23 |
| Visit ProShop ERP → | Visit Fulcrum → |
Practitioner take
Pick the one whose data model matches how work flows through your shop: if every order is a quoted, routed job, favor job-shop systems (job costing, routings, travelers). If you build repeat products from stock, favor MRP/inventory-centric tools. Run both demos with one real, messy job from last month.